① 预付退费向导

预付卡退费怎么算:原因分叉后的双口径对照试算

Ordered wizard · unlock the next gate only after the current step passes · local comparison, not a single promised refund number

  1. 1 退费原因
  2. 2 七日例外
  3. 3 卡的类型
  4. 4 优惠形态
  5. 5 填写数字
  6. 6 对照与路径

第 1 步:先分清退费原因

错误原因分叉会整单算错。身体健康、没时间、消费者侧搬家,通常仍是消费者原因(可依第 13 条第 2 款请求解除,但折价走第 19 条打折前价格)。经营者迁店明显不便、擅自转给第三人、闭店或不能正常提供不限次服务,才是非消费者原因(第 13 条第 1 款、第 18 条)。

非正式法律意见(结果卡后)。 试算不是胜诉保证,也不是律师服务。调解或判决可能不同于试算。不上传数据。不适用于多用途预付卡。

对照表尚未生成。请先选择退费原因。本页按法释〔2025〕4号做本地试算,非正式法律意见。

This wizard compares statutory trial numbers; it does not promise a refund

Chinese prepaid consumption disputes around gym cards, beauty stored-value cards, and training lesson packs still recur after Interpretation SPC 2025 No. 4 took effect on 1 May 2025. People usually search after a shop quotes a low refund or even claims the consumer owes extra money. Nearby free tools answer a different job: a gym-card “is it worth buying” calculator, a general rights-defense script, or a Taiwan contract refund estimator. This page is a mainland ordered wizard: choose the refund reason, choose session card versus time card, describe discount / gift amount / gift sessions, enter prepaid and used figures plus the merchant quote, then read a comparison table.

The comparison table shows the statutory trial refund, any contract figure that is more favorable to the consumer, the merchant quote, the gap, and an Article 20 no-overdraft warning when original-price redemption exceeds the prepaid amount. It never auto-deducts Article 15 “reasonable expenses” (staff commissions are not reasonable expenses) and never auto-values Article 21 heterogeneous gifts. Multi-purpose prepaid cards are out of scope under Article 26. Interest under Articles 16–17 and punitive damages under Article 23 are explained on the FAQ path list only.

How it works, in order: classify the reason; check the two seven-day exceptions; pick the card type; pick the privilege form; fill the numbers including optional contract math and market price the user supplies; export the comparison plus evidence and 12315 / consumer-association / small-claim paths. Next: how-to · FAQ · use cases.

Sources to re-read before you negotiate: the SPC publication page, the Zhangping personal-training case write-up, the 2026 typical closed-gym case, and the 2026 news investigation about refunds that first demand extra payment. This site is not affiliated with any court, gym, or law firm.